Find the bottleneck
- Where do you add capacity so it *actually* helps?
- Foldhaus: a flat-pack desk line, orders piling up, one budget to spend
- *Presenter note:* Say the honest line — teaching material, not a certification.
The case & the three pitches
- Five stations in sequence: Cut 45 · Drill&edge 18 · Sand 30 · Assemble 22 · Pack 50
- Pitch A: saw 45→70 · Pitch B: drill 18→28 · Pitch C: pack 50→65
- *Presenter note:* Take the vote now, before any teaching. Record the split; don't comment.
The bottleneck sets the throughput
- Every desk passes through every station in order
- The line can't finish faster than its slowest step → 18 desks/hr
- Not the average (33), not the fast stations
- *Presenter note:* The bottleneck is often quiet; the pile sits *upstream* of it.
An hour spent where it counts
- Speed a non-bottleneck (A or C) → line still ships 18, pile just grows
- Speed the bottleneck (B) → line rises to 22, then Assemble (22) takes over
- Only improvement at the constraint reaches the customer
Your table's call
- Find the bottleneck → test each pitch → make the call → name the cost of being wrong
- One free move before spending any money
- *Presenter note:* Circulate; ask "if that station runs faster, what does the slowest step do?"
The five focusing steps
- Identify → Exploit → Subordinate → Elevate → Repeat
- Elevate (spend money) is step *four*, after the free gains
- Once you elevate, the constraint moves — go again
Why local efficiency lies
- Rewarding "100% busy" pushes fast stations to build work-in-process
- The only efficiency that pays is throughput of finished desks
- *Presenter note:* Tie back to the opening vote — the big number (A) was the trap.
Takeaway
- A line runs at the speed of its slowest step
- The only capacity worth buying is capacity at the constraint
- Further reading: the
find-the-bottleneck Decide course